How about an option to specify the icon file to be used for expanding and collapsing?  I can edit the expand.jpg/collapse.jpg files, but it would be nice if a different instance in a site could have a different set of images.  Alt text for the image would make the site more accessible as well.

Thanks for a cool module.

Heff

Might want to change the default expand/collapse icon to the +/- ones used by DNN for the container maximize/minimize control.  It would provide consistency with the site and they're installed in every DNN install by default, you could use the standard location.  Then if DNN 5.0 would add those icons to the skinnable list...  " border=0>

Thanks,

Jeff

The ones I'm talking about are in the core images folder.  They are /images/folderplus.gif and /images/folderminus.gif.

Thanks,

Jeff

Hi Mitchel,

I installed the Expandable Text/HTML a few months ago and have been using it on one portal in the install..  At the time, I had found a posting on your forums on how to modify the setup and remove or hide the icon for expand collapse, which I did successfully.   Unfortunately, I cannot remember how it was done and cannot find the info now.

I had a need to use the module within another portal on the same DNN install, but when I loaded it, it had the images (I think I was on version 1.6 of your module)

Today, in installed the latest version of module.   The way I had setup the original site did not get changed with the upgrade, so the icon is still hidden, and this is great.   However, on the other portal where I just added the module, it has the +/- icon on it.  Can you tell me what I might have done to hide the image, and how to do it again?   I do not see any settings for this on the module.

Thank you.
Terence

TMMworld.net

Thank you very much, that was nice an easy. 

I also found how the other portal kept the original settings.  In the same folder, there is a file ViewExpandableTextHtml.ascx.Portal-26.resx  with a March date on it.   To keep the install clean, would you recommend this be removed?    If so, I guess I would have to  change something else that points to it.  If it is too complicated, I will leave it alone.

Thanks again,
Terence