OpenForce 2009 Recap 

Well, it has been a very busy week, but we can now record another OpenForce event in the books.  I'm sitting here still in Las Vegas going over various notes regarding various announcements that have occurred through the week and though it would be good to make a blog post with a few "highlights" as I see them from the week.  So, without future delay, here are my favorite highlights from the week, in no particular order!

Telerik Controls to Ship with DNN CE and PE

During the keynote address Shaun Walker announced that the Telerik ASP.NET controls will be distributed as part of the next DotNetNuke release.  To me this is a very major milestone, as being a regular user of the Telerik controls for my regular ASP.NET development activities I would enjoy a streamlined way of being able to use them within DotNetNuke, removing the risk of dll conflicts.

Based on future discussions it is important to note that the MOST CURRENT release of Telerik will be included, and that developers looking to program against the dlls must have a valid license to the Telerik controls.  I'm sure that more information will be coming as we get the 5.2.x releases of DotNetNuke out the door.

DotNetNuke 5.2 to Release Next Week

In addition to the Telerik announcement Shaun noted that DotNetNuke 5.2 will be released next week, this release contains the Telerik controls and other new additions to the core.  I want to make a special reminder to everyone that this release is also the first to REQUIRE .NET 3.5 to run successfully!!!

Additional DotNetNuke Corporation Employees

Although I am not sure if this was announced at OpenForce specifically it is important to note that last week Joe Brinkman blogged about Additional New Hires for DotNetNuke Corporation.  These two new hires are individuals that are well known to many of us, Philip Beadle and Alex Shirley, two great additions to the team.  Congrats to both DotNetNuke and each of the individuals on their new roles!

DotNetNuke "Express" Edition

Another announcement from the keynote was yet another "edition" of DotNetNuke.  This "express" edition is essentially a limited support only version of the Community Edition.  No new extensions or functionality will be provided simply additional services, including 2 yearly support incidents.  Expect more information to come from DotNetNuke corporation as this edition is released in the upcoming months.

DotNetNuke Peer Esteem Grant

Another announcement of the week was the creation of the DotNetNuke Peer Esteem Grant (PEG) program.  This information was released in detail via a blog posting by Scott W.  This program is a very nice initiative supported by the founders and rest of DotNetNuke corporation to give something back to those that have made notable contributions to the community.

I am proud to say that I am one of the 20 PEG awardees, and am highly honored to be a part of the award group.

DotNetNuke PE License Information

One of the biggest, recurring questions of the week was around the license model for DotNetNuke Professional edition, so I thought I would make a short post about it here as well.  The key items that were identified in discussions are as follows.

License Cost Is Per Production DNN Instance

One big question was how did licensing work in Web-Farm environments, it was confirmed, multiple times that when working with a web-farm, individual licenses are needed for EACH instance of DNN on each server.  So a single DNN installation that is balanced across two web servers would require two licenses, or two DNN Installations balanced across two web servers would require four licenses, etc.

License Is Yearly - Nag Notice Admin Only

The second common question was regarding what happened at the end of the year, if the license was not renewed.  It was noted that in 5.2.x and later versions of DotNetNuke that the "unlicensed" notification would be displayed on "Admin Only" views and that functionality would not be limited.  It was noted though that use, after the expiration of the license was essentially running unlicensed software.

Overall Summary

Overall it was a great week, I enjoyed the opportunity to meet with many members of the community.  A lot of great information was shared in sessions, after-session discussions, and during various evening events.  This posting tries to give a bit of insight and re-cap to the weeks activities, but is in no way a comprehensive list.  Be sure to check out the various community blogs and share anything extra that you would like to add below!

Posted by Mitchel on Sunday, November 15, 2009
 

Comments

Just want to point out that the DotNetNuke Professional Edition license is "per production instance" not "per server." Thus, it is not enough to know how many web heads are in a web farm to determine how many PE licenses are needed. You need to count the total number of production instances of DotNetNuke PE across all the web heads to determine the exact number of licenses needed. While it is common to have only a single instance per web head, this is not always the case so it's inaccurate to describe DotNetNuke PE licensing as "per server." To further clarify, "a production instance" is an IIS application configured to run DotNetNuke PE that is not for staging, testing, development or disaster recovery.

By Nik Kalyani on Sunday, November 15, 2009 at 6:04 PM

Nik,

Thanks, I apologize and have updated the article to reflect the proper license terms.

By mitchel.sellers@gmail.com on Sunday, November 15, 2009 at 7:45 PM

Thanks Mitchel for the write up. Lots of great things happening with DNN.

Stuart

By Stuart on Monday, November 16, 2009 at 10:54 AM

I was dissapointed to not see many of the Project Team Leads at this. There seemed to be less of this and more of the push for DNN Professional, which, in and of itself is not a bad thing. Would have been nice to have seen Antonio and many of the others who went to the earlier ones. It was good to see you there again Mitchel.

Just would have liked to see more of the people who are doing the grunt work for the money makers. Seemed like there was much less emphasis on CE than on PE.

By Johnathon on Tuesday, November 17, 2009 at 9:49 AM

I could agree with that to a certain point, but sadly, the presence of individual team members is most likely an exercise in economics rather than anything else.

Going to the conference with the admission, travel, hotel, etc gets to be very expensive. And with the economy as it is, I'm sure that was a driving factor for some of those that did not make it.

Yes it is unfortunate, but not anything that can be easily resolved.

By mitchel.sellers@gmail.com on Tuesday, November 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM

Hey Jonathan,

thank you for the mention :-) ... I missed all of you too! I had a great time last year presenting and meeting all of you DNN enthusiasts/professionals.
I wished that my schedule allowed me to attend.

I'll definitely make plan my schedules better next year!

Cheers!

@mitchel: nice post - thanks for sharing.

By Antonio Chagoury on Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 1:32 PM

Hi Mitchel,

Thanks for the post. Great news about the Telerik editor. Does that mean that the Fck Editor will be replaced by the Telerik editor? Just asking, because I'm using the MLHTML module (Apollo Software). I don't know if this module will work with the Telerik editor.
btw, Just bought your book on DotNetNuke Module Programming. Seems to me like a great way to start programming modules for DNN and getting a bigger insight in the DNN Framework in general.

Anthony
Belgium

By Anthony on Wednesday, November 25, 2009 at 6:56 AM

Hi Anthony,

As far as I know for the first deployment (5.2.x) there will be no changes to DNN, simply the dll will be present when it is installed.

The Telerik editor shouldn't have any impact on third-party modules, as the provider switch happens outside of the context of any third party module.

I think the future 5.3.x releases will really tell us the power of what Telerik means from a DNN core perspective, but I know I'm excited to release a few new modules for 5.2 and later.

By mitchel.sellers@gmail.com on Wednesday, November 25, 2009 at 8:54 AM

Comments from the following blog entry: OpenForce 2009 Recap, located at: http://pimpthisblog.com/OpenForce-2009-Recap

By PimpThisBlog.com on Monday, December 14, 2009 at 4:07 PM

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above:

Content provided in this blog is provided "AS-IS" and the information should be used at your own discretion.  The thoughts and opinions expressed are the personal thoughts of Mitchel Sellers and do not reflect the opinions of his employer.

Friend of RedGate

www.datasprings.com - DotNetNuke Modules ICG Hosting

Click here for advertising information.

Content in this blog is copyright protected.  Re-publishing on other websites is allowed as long as proper credit and backlink to the article is provided.  Any other re-publishing or distribution of this content is prohibited without written permission from Mitchel Sellers.